Page 55 - FDMAsia May/Jun 2026
P. 55

MATERIALS         53
         www.fdmasia.com | FDM ASIA MAY/JUN 2026




            To translate empirical findings into a practical strategic tool,   perceived importance of these three factors.
          the Ishikawa diagram (fishbone diagram) was used. Determinants   These  findings  support  Hypothesis  1. The  dominance  of
          that showed statistically significant differences and high mean   customer-related determinants can be explained by the demand-
          rank  values  were  grouped  into  thematic  categories,  forming   driven  nature  of  the  wood-processing  and  furniture  industry,
          the main branches of the diagram.                  where  production  is  closely  linked  to  final  consumption  and
            This structured approach helped visualise causal relationships   customer-specific requirements.

          between external environmental conditions, internal organisational   The  lower  importance  of  intermediaries  may  reflect  the
          factors, and strategic objectives of family businesses, and served   prevalence  of  direct  business  relationships  and  shorter
          as  a  foundation  for  formulating  a  sustainable  development   supply chains in family firms, which often establish long-term
          strategy.                                          partnerships directly with customers or suppliers.


          External Determinants & Non-Economic Goals         Non-Economic Goals & Relational Characteristics
          The survey asked respondents to evaluate the importance of   The survey also evaluated 17 entrepreneurial characteristics
          five external determinants: customers, suppliers, intermediaries,   of family businesses, including non-economic goals (e.g.,
          competitors, and the public (including local communities and   long-term  growth  and  sustainability  goals,  intergenerational

          regulatory bodies).                                continuity, family brand, emphasis on non-economic goals)
            Using  a  five-point  scale  from  “very  low  importance”  to   as well as relational factors (e.g., long-term relationships and
          “very  high  importance,”  the  results  showed  that  customers   reputation, trust, participation and engagement, customer
          were perceived as the most important determinant: 63 percent   satisfaction orientation).
          of  respondents  assigned  the  highest  importance  level  to   The  Kruskal-Wallis  test  showed  statistically  significant
          customers.  Suppliers  and  the  public  were  also  rated  highly,   differences  among  all  17  characteristics  (H  =  543.44,  p  <
          with 40 percent giving them the highest rating.    0.001). The highest mean ranks were recorded for long-term

            Competitors  showed  a  balanced  distribution,  with  most   relationships and reputation, followed by trust, participation and
          responses  in  the  positive  range.  In  contrast,  intermediaries   engagement, and customer satisfaction orientation.
          were  perceived  as  the  least  important  determinant,  with  40   Long-term  growth  and  sustainability  goals  ranked  fifth,
          percent of responses at the neutral level and relatively higher   while the “emphasis on non-economic goals” ranked 15th out
          proportions of negative evaluations.               of  17.  The  lowest  values  were  observed  for  family  council/
            The  Kruskal-Wallis  test  confirmed  statistically  significant   family protocol and high innovation potential.
          differences  among  the  five  determinants  (H  =  302.09,  p  <   This  indicates that although non-economic goals such
          0.001). From the perspective of mean ranks, the highest value
          was recorded for customers, followed by the public, suppliers,

          and  competitors,  while  the  lowest  mean  rank  was  observed                                    comp-u-floor.com
          for intermediaries.
            Post-hoc  multiple  comparisons  showed  that  customers
          differed significantly from all other determinants. Intermediaries
          also differed significantly from the other groups.
            No  significant  differences  were  found  between  suppliers,
          competitors,  and  the  public,  indicating  a  relatively  similar
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60