Page 34 - FDMAsia Mar/Apr 2026

32 DESIGN MAR/APR 2026 FDM ASIA | www.fdmasia.com

PICRYL was performed to provide context and background for the
research.
This involved studying scholarly articles and industry reports
that highlight the changes of furniture design and current trends.
The literature review helped in understanding the findings
of survey and interview and their interrelation. The three

data—survey results, interview findings, and literature—were
collectively analysed to attain a thorough understanding of
the topic.
This approach allowed the study to explore various viewpoints
but we don’t know if it is because of the market or changing through which the study could be confirmed and validated.
preferences that has led to this change. This study shall help
to answer it. Survey 1: Insights From Industry Professionals
This research utilises a mixed-methods strategy, combining Among the respondents, 87 percent identified as architects, with
both qualitative and quantitative methods within a framework of 30 percent of them possessing over 10 years of professional

data triangulation to explore the shift from traditional handcrafted experience and 20 percent having less than two years of
furniture to modular furniture. experience.
Using various data collections improves the reliability of Within this group, 29 percent were affiliated with architectural
the findings by providing a range of viewpoints. firms or academic institutions, while 24 percent operated as
Data gathering included an online survey, interviews, and freelancers or firm owners.
literature review. Two surveys were conducted with Survey Additionally, eight percent were involved in contractor-based
1 (57 respondents) who were professionals in the field and roles. This reflects a professionally diverse sample, consisting

Survey 2 (100 respondents) who were end-users. of a blend of practice, academia, and entrepreneurs.
Among industry professionals, those with over two years
The purpose of the survey was to understand what of experience show a clear preference for handmade furniture
drives (24%) over modular (16%), whereas those with less experience
preferences, reasons for choosing specific furniture types, prefer both equally.
cost, durability, and aesthetics. Industry professionals highlighted quick delivery, modern
It also examined whether participants preferred handmade aesthetics, and affordability as the primary reasons for preferring
or modular furniture. The quantitative results were analysed to modular furniture.
detect trends and patterns in consumer behaviour. In contrast, handmade furniture was favoured for its

For qualitative insights, interviews were held with professionals potential for customisation, distinctive design features, and
such as carpenters, interior designers and modular furniture extended durability.
employees in the furniture industry. Despite these differences, modular furniture is largely
The conversations concentrated on topics like the changing selected for applications such as kitchens, wardrobes, and
trends in furniture production, the materials utilised, and the sofas, according to industry insights.
expectations of contemporary consumers. Professionals reported the main challenges associated with
In addition to the survey and interviews, a literature review modular furniture to be limited customisation options, concerns